The project URL points to Startups.com, a legitimate and large startup ecosystem platform (owning Fundable, Clarity, etc.) with significant real-world utility. However, the submission itself is of extremely low quality: the submitter name 'ThunderBlade' (actually an OWC hard drive product) and claims like 'everyone' and 'most people' are unverifiable hyperboles. While the entity has verifiable traction, the submission fails to provide the required proof, resulting in a heavily penalized score despite the high potential of the underlying business.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline