The submission describes a plausible logistics solution for food startups in the UK, suggesting genuine real-world utility. However, the project evaluation is severely impacted by low-quality, spam-like metadata. Claims such as using 'space-technology' and having traction where 'most people have used my product' are demonstrably false or exaggerated. While the business model is viable, the lack of verifiable metrics and the unprofessional submission quality result in a score reflecting minimal proven usefulness.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline