The submission represents a standard IT service agency ('Stackholic Infotech') rather than a specific technology product. The entry contains significant red flags, including demonstrably false traction claims ('most people have used my product') and 'null' financial data. External verification reveals a small agency with minimal digital footprint (e.g., a single review on Clutch), contradicting the 'Audience Reach: everyone' claim. The description text is copy-pasted from a 'Careers' page, focusing on employee benefits rather than project utility, resulting in a near-zero score due to lack of verifiable proof of usefulness.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline