The project represents a legitimate local event management business (Sport in Action Ltd), but the submission quality is extremely poor. The description is raw copy-pasted text, and the traction claim ('most people have used my product') is factually incorrect and hyperbolic. While the underlying business has utility for its local niche (sold-out races), the submission fails to provide verifiable evidence of scale, technology, or broader impact. The low score reflects the lack of serious engagement with the evaluation criteria and the limitation to a very specific local geography without scalable technology.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline