The project represents a legitimate, regulated UK investment bank (SP Angel Corporate Finance LLP) with verifiable market presence and a client base of over 50 quoted companies. However, the submission itself is of extremely low quality, containing patently false claims (e.g., audience is 'everyone', traction is 'most people'), inaccurate data (team size exaggerated to 125 vs actual ~45), and nonsensical financial metrics ('all time marketcap: 2500000' in the revenue field). The high underlying utility and established nature of the firm save the score from being negligible, but the poor quality and dubious accuracy of the submission impose significant penalties.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline