The project appears to be a legitimate niche consultancy in medtech/behavioral science based on the description, but the submission data suffers from severe quality issues. Claims such as 'most people have used my product' and audience reach of 'everyone' are objectively false for a specialized B2B service. The project is non-technical (consulting) and the revenue metric uses incorrect terminology ('marketcap'). The low score reflects the non-tech nature and the lack of credible evidence provided in the form inputs.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline