The submission represents a professional consultancy profile rather than a technology project. While the associated entity (Mahaanui Kurataiao) and individual appear legitimate in the environmental sector, the submission lacks a scalable technological component. Claims regarding audience reach ('everyone') and traction ('most people have used my product') are hyperbolic and unverifiable. The project scores low due to a lack of technical innovation, unrealistic metrics, and poor data quality.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline