The submission lacks credibility due to hyperbolic claims ('most people have used my product', 'audience: everyone') and contradictory data (125 employees vs. $500k all-time revenue). The description appears to be keyword stuffing with no specific technical details or verifiable evidence of traction. The project resembles a low-effort entry or a parked domain with no genuine proof of usefulness provided.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline