The submission represents 'Socialfaim', a known influencer marketing platform, but fails significantly in providing credible evidence. The traction claim ('most people have used my product') is demonstrably hyperbolic and effectively invalidates the evidence section. The audience definition ('everyone') ignores the B2B nature of the product. While the underlying business exists with a small team (11-50), the low-quality, vague, and exaggerated submission data results in a near-zero score relative to the calibration benchmark.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline