The submission for Social Jazz contains critically low-quality data and demonstrably false claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product'). While the project appears to be a legitimate but small social media automation tool for SMBs, the input provides no verifiable metrics, technical details, or realistic audience analysis. The lack of evidence and the hyperbole in the traction section result in a score near zero, reflecting a failure to demonstrate proof of usefulness via this submission.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline