The submission describes a standard smartphone repair service but suffers from significant credibility issues. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is hyperbolic and factually incorrect for a local business. A web search for the provided URL and brand name yielded zero results, suggesting the project has no digital footprint despite a claimed 2017 launch. The financial metric labeled 'marketcap' is likely a misuse of terminology for lifetime revenue, and without verifiable evidence, the project scores extremely low on traction and reach.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline