The project submission represents a globally recognized platform (Skype/Microsoft Teams) but fails to provide a credible Proof of Usefulness due to extremely poor response quality. The description is generic boilerplate text for the parent company rather than the specific product. Key fields contain historical inaccuracies (e.g., launch date) or misplaced data (acquisition cost listed as market cap/revenue). While the 'teams.live.com' URL is authoritative, the methodology heavily penalizes the lack of specific evidence, verifiable metrics, and effort, resulting in a score that reflects the quality of the submission rather than the utility of the product itself.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline