The submission for Silvermint lacks credibility due to demonstrably false claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product') and a lack of verifiable data. While Silvermint exists as a blockchain infrastructure concept, this specific submission provides no technical details, roadmap, or proof of adoption. The response quality is poor, containing typos and vague assertions ('construction' as a technology), resulting in a score reflecting minimal traction and high uncertainty.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline