The project represents a technical consultancy with founders boasting impressive backgrounds (ex-Apple, CERN, Stem Inc), verified via external search. However, the submission itself contains significant red flags and data inconsistencies. Specifically, the claim of 30 team members contradicts the reported 'all time marketcap' of 50,000, which suggests extremely low revenue or a typo. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is likely a reference to the founders' past employment at major corporations rather than the traction of Shypwright LLC itself. The vague audience definition ('everyone') and confusing metrics result in a low score despite the team's apparent technical competence.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline