While 'Shak AI Coaching' appears to be a legitimate consulting firm based on external search (linked to Marlow Advisory Group), the project submission itself is of critically low quality. It contains placeholder text ('most people have used my product'), unrealistic audience claims ('everyone'), and confusing financial terminology ('marketcap' used likely for revenue). These red flags and lack of verifiable evidence in the submission result in a low Proof of Usefulness score, despite the potential utility of the underlying consulting services.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline