The submission for 'SEO Engineering' describes a standard service-based agency with no discernible technical innovation or scalable product component. The project claims 'most people have used my product' and lists an audience of 'everyone', which are demonstrably false and hyperbolic claims that severely impact credibility. The reported financials ('marketcap: 50000') are confusingly labeled and suggest minimal traction relative to the team size of 6. The submission lacks evidence of a viable growth trajectory, proprietary technology, or significant market impact, resulting in a score reflecting minimal to no verifiable utility as a scalable technology project.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline