The submission evaluates 'Senso', a well-established Australian footwear brand (est. 1980), but contains critical data inconsistencies, including the project name 'DeepForge' and hyperbolic claims ('most people have used my product'). While the brand has verifiable longevity and retail presence, the submission quality is critically low, and the project lacks technical innovation relevant to the evaluation framework. The revenue figure ($2.5M) appears low for the claimed team size (350), suggesting further data inaccuracies.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline