The submission for Seelingo/ThunderStorm presents significant credibility issues. The description appears to be boilerplate e-commerce text, and the technology section lists only 'Internet,' indicating a lack of technical depth. Most critically, the traction claim that 'most people have used my product' is objectively hyperbolic and unsupported by the stated financial metrics ('marketcap 500000'). While the target market (medical/elderly care) has utility, the low quality of the submission and unrealistic claims result in a near-zero score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline