The submission represents 'Seedify', a well-established Web3 launchpad, but the content provided is incoherent and heavily flagged. The description appears to be a copy-pasted job advertisement for an unrelated or internal AI autocompletion tool (referencing GPT-NeoX-20B and specific latency targets), rather than a description of the Seedify platform. Additionally, the traction claim 'most people have used my product' is demonstrably false and unprofessional. While the URL points to a high-value project with significant real-world market cap, the submission itself is of extremely low quality, containing red flags that severely penalize the score according to PoU methodology.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline