The submission conflates two distinct entities: 'Seabourne Group' (a large global logistics firm) and 'Seabourne Inc' (a small, likely dormant US-based data consultancy). The URL and email domain belong to the consultancy, while the description and team size refer to the logistics company. Additionally, the traction claim ('most people have used my product') is objectively false and the audience definition ('everyone') is lazy. This severe inaccuracy and lack of verifiable data result in a minimal score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline