The submission describes a professional management consulting firm ('Scipio & Partners') rather than a technology project. While the business description is professional and articulate, the submission fails key evaluation criteria for a tech focused assessment: 1) There is no technological innovation or custom tech stack (strictly service-based). 2) The traction claims are factually impossible ('most people have used my product' is incorrect for a boutique B2B firm) and the revenue metric uses incorrect terminology ('marketcap' for a private firm). 3) The target audience is erroneously listed as 'everyone' rather than the specific corporate executive niche required for such services. The score reflects the non-technical nature of the project and the low quality of the data provided in the traction and reach fields.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline