The submission describes 'Sciety', a legitimate and reputable Nordic life science investment company (likely Sciety AB). However, the submission data provided is of extremely low quality and contains significant inaccuracies (e.g., claiming audience reach is 'everyone' and traction evidence as 'most people have used my product', which is factually false for a specialized VC firm). While the underlying entity has real-world utility and traction (raising over 1bn SEK historically), the PoU score is heavily penalized by the unverifiable and hallucinated claims in the input fields.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline