The project represents a legitimate UK consultancy (SCI-Tech Systems Ltd) with a history of innovation, including a 2008 Galileo Masters award for a marine tracker. However, the submission is critically flawed: it contains demonstrably false claims regarding traction ('most people have used my product') and audience reach ('everyone'). External search indicates the product (likely the 'Sci-Tech POB') has been a prototype on hold for years. The input 'marketcap' is unverified and incorrectly labeled. The disparity between the legitimate engineering history and the low-quality, hyperbolic submission results in a very low score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline