The submission appears to be a low-quality entry for a standard legal service ('Scherr Law Firm') masquerading as a technology project, potentially submitted via a template or bot given the incongruous data (e.g., 'StarShade' name, 'all time marketcap', claim that 'most people have used my product'). While the law firm likely exists as a small business, the submission lacks technical innovation, presents demonstrably false audience reach claims, and fails to demonstrate relevant tech traction. The Proof of Usefulness is minimal due to the non-technical nature of the business and the poor quality/credibility of the submission data.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline