The submission for Scalar (scalar-labs.com) presents significant red flags regarding credibility and traction. While the reported team size (36-40) suggests an operating entity, the claim that 'most people have used my product' is objectively false for a niche distributed ledger technology provider. The project lacks verifiable metrics, revenue data, or specific use cases. The vague description and hyperbolic claims result in the lowest quality multipliers, yielding a score indicative of a project with minimal proven public utility or a highly questionable submission quality.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline