The project represents SAS Institute, a global leader in analytics with undeniable scale ($3B+ revenue, 12,000+ employees) and utility. However, the submission quality was exceptionally poor, with vague claims ('most people have used my product', 'everyone') and missing financial data. While the verifiable entity (SAS) warrants a top-tier score (700+) based on real-world impact, the score is penalized heavily due to the low-quality response and lack of specific evidence provided in the input, landing it in the lower end of the 'Large Scale' calibration range.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline