The submission for SaRo Consulting describes a generic IT consulting firm but suffers from severe data quality issues and lack of verifiable evidence. Claims such as 'most people have used my product' and an audience of 'everyone' are realistically impossible for a 6-person team, indicating either a lack of seriousness or a misunderstanding of the evaluation criteria. The revenue metric ('all time marketcap: 500000') is mislabeled and unverifiable. No specific custom technology or tangible traction signals were provided, resulting in a score reflecting a project with minimal proof of usefulness or existence.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline