The submission appears to conflate two distinct entities, resulting in a severe discrepancy between the claims and verifiable reality. The URL and description refer to 'Sama' (sama.io), a UK-based professional coaching startup founded around 2020 with <50 employees. However, the submitted metrics (Team Size: 4240, Launch Year: 2008, Business Type: Data Annotation) belong to 'Sama' (formerly Samasource, sama.com), a completely different US-based AI data annotation unicorn. Additionally, the traction claim 'most people have used my product' is verifiably false for a B2B coaching application. Due to these critical inaccuracies and the misrepresentation of a seed-stage startup using a mature unicorn's metrics, the score is heavily penalized for lack of credibility and response quality.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline