The project addresses a valid industry problem (music royalty management), but the submission is critically flawed. The claim that "most people have used my product" is demonstrably false and undermines credibility. With no verifiable web presence (search results yielded no footprint for royalti.io) and vague inputs listing industries as 'technologies', the project fails to demonstrate legitimate traction or technical viability.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline