The submission references a legitimate and significant entity, Royal London Asset Management (RLAM), and a plausible project scope (Residential Property Manager, likely aligned with the recent 'ProperTies Living' launch). However, the submission quality is extremely low, featuring hyperbolic claims ('everyone', 'most people'), nonsensical financial data ('1000000001'), and a lack of specific technical or operational details. While the underlying entity has immense real-world utility and traction, the submission fails to provide the necessary 'Proof' of usefulness, resulting in a heavily penalized score due to the 'Quality Factor'.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline