The submission for Roamr contains significant discrepancies and unsubstantiated claims. While the URL resolves to a UK-based mystery trail/scavenger hunt business (suggesting real-world existence), the submission describes it as 'Corporate travel management' and claims 'most people have used my product' without providing metrics. The lack of specific data, combined with grandiose audience claims and a low-quality submission, results in a score reflecting minimal verifiable traction and poor evidence presentation.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline