The submission represents a standard digital marketing service but suffers significantly from low credibility and hyperbolic claims. The assertion that 'most people have used my product' is factually incorrect for a small agency with a team of 6. The misuse of terminology (citing 'marketcap' instead of revenue) and the lack of specific technical details further degrade the score. There is no verifiable evidence of traction to support the ambitious claims, placing this project in the lowest tier of evaluation.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline