The project represents a legitimate academic and social innovation framework ('Restorative Innovation') co-developed by Professor Virginia Cha and Jovan Tan, with verifiable activities such as the World Restorative Innovation Forum (2018) and associated curriculum at NUS. However, the submission quality is critically low, containing demonstrably false claims ('most people have used my product', 'audience reach: everyone') and odd data anomalies (Submitter Name 'IronForge', 'marketcap' metric for a non-profit). While the underlying concept has academic merit and relevance to sustainability, the specific project submission fails to demonstrate significant technological utility or verifiable scale commensurate with the claims.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline