The project submission suffers from severe credibility issues, primarily due to the hyperbolic claim that 'most people have used' the product, which contradicts the team size of 6 and lack of brand recognition. The technical description ('Internet') provides no insight into the stack or innovation. While the revenue figure (500,000) suggests some activity, the phrasing 'all time marketcap' is ambiguous. The submission scores poorly on response quality and evidence of traction due to these unverifiable and vague assertions.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline