The submission represents 'Retable.ai' (likely Retable.io), a legitimate no-code data management platform. However, the submission quality is critically low, featuring delusional claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', 'audience reach: everyone') and nonsensical financial data ('marketcap: null'). While the underlying technology (an Airtable competitor) has real-world utility and verifiable external traction, the specific submission fails to demonstrate credibility or professionalism, resulting in a severe penalty. The score reflects the existence of a real product weighed down by a red-flag submission.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline