The project represents a legitimate and highly impactful global non-profit organization (Resilient Cities Network). However, the submission itself appears to be low-quality or fraudulent, characterized by a fake email address, hyperbolic and false claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product'), and a lack of specific evidence. While the real-world entity has significant utility and market timing, the submission fails to provide verifiable data, resulting in a low score due to severe penalties on response quality and traction evidence.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline