The submission represents a game art outsourcing studio with a team of one. The project lacks verifiable digital presence (the provided URL is not indexed or reachable). The claim that 'most people have used my product' contradicts the team size and lack of specific portfolio evidence, suggesting either a misunderstanding of the metrics or an exaggerated submission. Without tangible evidence of traction, revenue, or specific credits, the project scores very low on the PoU scale.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline