The submission presents a legitimate, award-winning NHS initiative ('Research for the Future') suffering from a highly erratic submission form. While the underlying project has verifiable utility in clinical research recruitment (14k volunteers, 250 studies), the submission metadata contains nonsensical claims (e.g., 'marketcap: 75,000,000', 'most people have used my product', and the name 'SwiftStorm'). The score reflects the project's genuine but regional/small-scale utility (<50k users), heavily penalized for the incoherent and likely erroneous data provided in the traction and revenue fields.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline