The submission points to a legitimate form-building tool (Reform.app), but the provided metadata (Team Size 125, Launch 2014, Name 'SwiftHeart') is highly inaccurate and likely erroneous. While the actual software at the URL is a functional, well-designed indie product, the submission's claims of 'everyone' being the audience and 'most people' having used it are demonstrably false. The discrepancy between the high-quality URL and the low-quality, inaccurate data heavily penalizes the score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline