The submission presents significant red flags, including demonstrably false traction claims ('most people have used my product') and a mismatch between the project name 'LunarWing' and the description of a freelance consultancy 'Reesink E-Commerce'. The technical description ('Internet') provides no insight, and the reach claim ('everyone') is unrealistic for a niche service. While the underlying business type (e-commerce consultancy) has theoretical utility, the low-quality submission and lack of verifiable evidence result in a negligible score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline