The submission represents 'ReadWrite', a verified and well-established legacy technology media brand. However, the submission quality is critically low, featuring hyperbolic claims (e.g., 'audience reach: everyone', 'most people have used my product') and lacking specific, verifiable data on current traction. While the domain's historical authority and backlink profile confirm significant real-world utility and reach, the lack of effort in the application and the absence of modern growth metrics necessitate a heavy penalty. The score reflects the intrinsic value of the asset but is capped by the poor quality of evidence provided.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline