The submission for RCSG presents significant red flags and contradictions. While a small consulting entity named RCSG exists (likely the 2-9 person firm in Portland, OR listed on Clutch), the submitted metrics are highly suspect. Claiming a team size of 30 with a total lifetime 'marketcap' (likely revenue) of $500,000 implies an impossibly low revenue per employee (~$3k/year). Furthermore, the claim that 'most people have used my product' is demonstrably false for a boutique B2B logistics consultancy. The input lacks specific technical details, audience definition is unrealistically broad ('everyone'), and the terminology ('marketcap' for a private service firm) indicates poor data quality. The project scores extremely low due to lack of verifiable traction, realistic scaling, or clear utility definition.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline