The submission for Raven Protocol contains significant inaccuracies, most notably the claim that 'most people have used my product,' which is contradicted by market data showing a daily trading volume of under $10 and a micro-cap valuation (~$300k) for a project launched in 2017. While the concept of decentralized AI training is relevant, the project appears to be functionally inactive ('zombie status') with abandoned GitHub repositories and negligible adoption compared to competitors like Bittensor. The score reflects the lack of verifiable utility and the poor quality of the submission.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline