The submission for 'RankPast' lacks credibility and verifiable data. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is demonstrably false given the lack of digital footprint. The project lists a confusing 'marketcap' metric instead of revenue and claims a 30-person team with no supporting evidence. The response quality is extremely low, suggesting a placeholder or low-effort entry.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline