The submission for QRInno presents significant credibility issues. While the company appears to be a long-standing consulting or recruitment entity (founded 2007), the provided metrics are contradictory and hyperbolic. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is unverifiable and likely false for a B2B consultancy. The 'marketcap' of 50,000 is inconsistent with a 30-person team operating for 17 years. The lack of specific product details, combined with low-effort responses ('everyone', 'Software Development'), results in a minimal score reflecting a lack of verifiable proof of usefulness.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline