Proof of Usefulness Report

qlip

Analysis completed on 1/28/2026

+261
Proof of Usefulness Score
Gaining Momentum

The submission conflates two distinct entities: 'Qlip.ai' (an AI video repurposing tool) and 'Qlip B.V.' (a Dutch dairy analysis company), resulting in contradictory data (e.g., 'Dairy analysis' business type vs. 'Video Creation' description). External verification confirms 'Qlip.ai' is a functional product with roughly 140k monthly visits, occupying a 'promising but early' position in the creator economy. However, the submission's claim of 'everyone' as the audience and 'most people' for traction is demonstrably false and negatively impacts the score. The project has strong market timing and decent verifiable traffic, but the submission quality is critically low due to the data mix-up.

Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?

Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes

View All Reports

Score Breakdown

Real World Utility+130
Audience Reach Impact+32
Technical Innovation+37.5
Evidence Of Traction+37.5
Market Timing Relevance+85
Functional Completeness+2.5
Subtotal+324.5
Usefulness Multiplierx0.805
Final Score+261

Project Details

Project URL
Description
qlipis in the Video Creation Tools Industry

Algorithm Insights

Market Position
Growing utility with room for optimization
User Engagement
Documented reach suggests active user community
Technical Stack
Modern tech stack aligned with sponsor technologies

Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score

Document User Growth

Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates

Showcase Revenue Model

Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams

Expand Evidence Base

Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation

Technical Roadmap

Share development milestones and feature completion timeline