The project presents a coherent description of an energy monitoring solution but severely lacks credibility due to contradictory and unrealistic metadata. While the core concept of SME energy efficiency is valid, the submission claims 'everyone' as the audience and states 'most people have used my product,' which is objectively false for a B2B service. The input 'technologiesUsed' is listed merely as 'Internet,' and the 'marketcap' revenue metric suggests a confusion with crypto-economics or a lack of business understanding. The disparity between the professional description and the low-effort metadata results in a negligible score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline