The submission represents 'Pulsus Group,' a subsidiary of OMICS International, which is widely classified as a 'predatory publisher' and has faced significant legal judgments (e.g., $50M FTC ruling) for deceptive practices. The project provides negative real-world utility by undermining scientific integrity. The submission data itself is fraught with hyperbole ('most people have used my product'), inconsistencies (3,000 employees vs. $2.5M market cap), and lack of evidence. The combination of ethical red flags, negative utility to the scientific community, and poor response quality results in a near-zero score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline