The submission appears to conflate two distinct entities: a Web3 DAO platform (Prysm.xyz) and a legacy visual collaboration company (Prysm.com). The launch date (2005) and business type match the latter, while the description matches the former. Critical data fields contain highly dubious or false claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', 'space-technology'). Due to the contradictory information, false traction claims, and lack of verifiable current activity for the Web3 project, the Proof of Usefulness is negligible.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline