The project addresses a valid need for merit-based product management portfolios, but the submission is heavily penalized for clearly inaccurate claims. While the description is detailed, the claim that 'most people have used my product' undermines credibility entirely. The launch date (2003) likely refers to the parent consulting firm rather than this specific platform, and the 'technologies used' field lists business topics instead of a tech stack. Without verifiable traction metrics to support the scale of the team (125 people), the project scores low on evidence and execution.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline